Why are LEs limited? Will they come back?
#51
Posted 23 December 2007 - 06:33 PM
if you post an in-search-of post for capricorn in the swaps area, you'll probably be able to find some.
#52
Posted 23 December 2007 - 09:43 PM
concrescence, on Dec 23 2007, 01:33 PM, said:
if you post an in-search-of post for capricorn in the swaps area, you'll probably be able to find some.
Hmm. Thanks for your reply.
That makes buying zodiac scents tricky! I've got to plan in November to get a scent in time for January! Alas. I'll go check the swaps page-- thanks for the suggestion.
#53
Posted 23 December 2007 - 10:26 PM
mazikeen, on Dec 23 2007, 03:43 PM, said:
concrescence, on Dec 23 2007, 01:33 PM, said:
if you post an in-search-of post for capricorn in the swaps area, you'll probably be able to find some.
Hmm. Thanks for your reply.
That makes buying zodiac scents tricky! I've got to plan in November to get a scent in time for January! Alas. I'll go check the swaps page-- thanks for the suggestion.
Don't give up hope. And if you don't find it in Swaps, you could post in the Wanted section there, so somebody with an extra bottle might see you need some.
#54
Posted 16 February 2008 - 12:31 AM
I also think it would be a bad idea for bpal to start selling single notes again. That's sorta like Coca Cola selling their ingredients, then posting their highly secretive recipe (ie bpal note lists) on a website. It'd be a terribly unwise business move, which is undoubtedly why bpal no longer sells single notes.
So with my commentary out of the way, here is another one that was touched upon slightly a few responses earlier. Sure, LE's are rereleased each year in slightly different formulations (Sugar Skull, Samhain, Krampus, etc) -- but what about GC? What about stuff like Djinn? I love Djinn, but how does this stuff survive while Asphodel dies? Djinn gets such poor reviews on this forum, I see very little praise for it and I cannot imagine there is much of a demand for something that smells so acrid. I'd imagine one formulation of Djinn would be all you'd ever need to make.
If you look at the reviews for Dracul, you'll see most of the posts seem to sing the same song, but the last page of reviews starts to mention an overpowering mint smell. My Dracul (older) has no mint. This leads me to believe Dracul was recently reformulated and a little too much mint got thrown in?
#55
Posted 16 February 2008 - 01:55 AM
olive, on Feb 15 2008, 09:31 PM, said:
From what I've heard, the lab makes more money per item on bottles than on imps. I guess they could just sell pricier imps of LE scents, but honestly I don't know much about BPAL's business model.
Personally I find it hard to believe that *every single LE blend* is LE because of its ingredients, but frankly they're not marketed as if they were, so I don't care too much :P.
Quote
Notes lists aren't recipes. Very, very far from it. Look up any perfume on the internet and you'll find a note list to go along with it, many quite detailed. Notes =/= ingredients.
I also highly doubt that one of us could just buy a bunch of BPAL single notes and recreate Beth's blends. First of all, I strongly doubt that she made available *every single ingredient* she used in her blends when the single notes were available. Second, mixing oils is more than just dumping several nice-smelling ingredients together. I have a few very lovely books on creating one's own perfume oils, and it isn't an easy task for a beginner, especially if you want to create something that actually smells nice.
Quote
Makes me wish I'd tested my brand-new bottle of Dracul (before I sold it) and compared it to my old 10 ml. And it might simply have been a batch difference. Take Morocco, for example--there's a standard creamy "Antique Lace-esque" variety and the occasional "OMG CEDAR" variety. Just batch differences.
#56
Posted 16 February 2008 - 03:08 AM
This post has been edited by GypsyRoseRed: 16 February 2008 - 03:09 AM
#57
Posted 16 February 2008 - 03:14 AM
GypsyRoseRed, on Feb 16 2008, 12:08 AM, said:
If a perfumer could identify an oil's supplier simply by sniffing the single note, they 1) have mad skillz beyond the realm of normal science and or 2) they already know who the supplier is and have thus already explored that venue.
And if they went so far as to do a chemical analysis, well...you can do a chemical analysis on blends, too.
#58
Posted 16 February 2008 - 03:37 AM
joseybird, on Feb 15 2008, 07:14 PM, said:
And if they went so far as to do a chemical analysis, well...you can do a chemical analysis on blends, too.
I'd imagine Beth weighed the risk of selling single notes vs the possible profit and made a decision. I think it is a sound decision for any business owner. Regardless of what market you're in, the fewer options people have to buy from, the better. Of course, the customer wants the most options, because the more options you have, the lower the prices go, and the harder the struggle is to improve quality.
Sure, Beth doesn't list exact recipes... but why make it easy for someone who may actually possess the skill to blend oils to elbow their way into her market? I've really not seen any company that does anything similar to what bpal does, however I could easily see a competitor or two popping up and cutting into an otherwise solidified fanbase. I can't imagine Beth woke up one day and was like "I'm just going to stop selling every single note for the fun of it!" :P :D
I'm sure there was a justifiable cause to pull them from the site and I'd be very surprised if they were ever put back up for sale by Beth.
#59
Posted 16 February 2008 - 03:54 AM
olive, on Feb 16 2008, 12:37 AM, said:
joseybird, on Feb 15 2008, 07:14 PM, said:
And if they went so far as to do a chemical analysis, well...you can do a chemical analysis on blends, too.
I'd imagine Beth weighed the risk of selling single notes vs the possible profit and made a decision. I think it is a sound decision for any business owner. Regardless of what market you're in, the fewer options people have to buy from, the better. Of course, the customer wants the most options, because the more options you have, the lower the prices go, and the harder the struggle is to improve quality.
Sure, Beth doesn't list exact recipes... but why make it easy for someone who may actually possess the skill to blend oils to elbow their way into her market? I've really not seen any company that does anything similar to what bpal does, however I could easily see a competitor or two popping up and cutting into an otherwise solidified fanbase. I can't imagine Beth woke up one day and was like "I'm just going to stop selling every single note for the fun of it!" :P :D
I'm sure there was a justifiable cause to pull them from the site and I'd be very surprised if they were ever put back up for sale by Beth.
I'm sure there's a good reason. I'm just not ready to say "This MUST be the reason" without any situational facts. I believe that Beth stated the desire to focus on her blends as the reason for taking down the single notes; if there are other reasons, we do nothing but speculate vaguely unless Beth decides to tell us.
#60
Posted 16 February 2008 - 04:15 AM
#61
Posted 16 February 2008 - 04:48 AM
olive, on Feb 15 2008, 10:37 PM, said:
Hi olive!
I think that I understand that you're speaking in general and business terms, and when you refer to 'options' you are talking GC blends, LE blends, and single notes as options.
I found your comment particularly curious because I see BPAL from the opposite perspective, which is that they have so many damn options that I'll never ever have a chance to try half of everything. Between all of the limited blends, the hundreds of GC perfumes, the Trading Post, and TAL, I think that the overwhelming array of choices is a huge part of what attracted me to BPAL in the first place.
I hope to be optioned till the day I die from BPAL....hopefully Beth and Ted's little angel-bibby will carry on the tradition!
#62
Posted 16 February 2008 - 05:39 AM
joseybird: I hope not to convey in any way that my opinion is fact or that I'm suggesting I know why Beth does certain things. For all I know this entire company of hers could be completely accidental and every business move done on a whim without any thought... for all we know zombiefied magical rabbits concoct all of these oils under Beth's direction... but I have my doubts :P
This post has been edited by olive: 16 February 2008 - 05:41 AM
#63
Posted 19 February 2008 - 06:21 AM
#64
Posted 19 February 2008 - 06:49 AM
your best bet for getting an "untainted" fresh-from-the-lab bottle would be to stalk lab ebay sales. you never know what they're going to dig out of storage and put up for auction.
#65
Posted 19 February 2008 - 06:54 AM
#66
Posted 20 February 2008 - 03:52 AM
voix, on Feb 19 2008, 05:21 PM, said:
I don't know exactly what you classify as 'untainted' but I know many BPALers cleanly test their oils with toothpicks etc, so you could try searching for cleanly tested bottles.
#67
Posted 22 February 2008 - 05:19 AM
i think i'll just look for cleanly tested bottles. though the hoarder in me(i do so love purple phoenix. so much it's not funny anymore) want every last bit i can find. pelase please make it a GC scent if it's not because the ingredients are too expensive.
i dab it on everything seriously. my clothes, my paper in the study, my burner, my curtains, i diluted a little bit and spray it round the room.
#68
Posted 03 March 2012 - 03:02 PM
#69
Posted 03 March 2012 - 04:39 PM
Numanoid, on 03 March 2012 - 03:02 PM, said:
Occasionally the lab will resurrect a scent and there may be a slight reformulation. I personally think of the reformulations as batch differences and those have been known to happen for any scent, LE or otherwise, over the course of a small period. Although I do have less than a handful of LE or D/c scents that I am always on the lookout new favorites can overshadow the old. For example Bakeneko is a favorite but I parted with my back up bottle because something new came along that I liked better. Right now I am all over Shroomy Chocolates when I was all over Gluttony. Yeah both are no longer available but when I ordered the Shroomy I did so because I had just gone over the notes of Gluttony {crying over not having any} and noticed a similarity.
I know that might not be helpful. I too am insanely curious about Cake Smash and Cabaret Goth cus it seems nobody will part with it and I was inactive during the time they came out but over the years, and there have been quite a few with BPAL, I would say that there really is something wonderful on the horizon despite it sounding like a 'there there' whilst clutching the precious
#70
Posted 03 March 2012 - 06:46 PM
In the case of Storyville, I wouldn't bank on it coming back, as only a small batch was created in a singular moment of inspiration.
#71
Posted 03 March 2012 - 09:39 PM
#72
Posted 05 March 2012 - 05:49 PM
Numanoid, on 03 March 2012 - 09:39 PM, said:
One thing to keep in mind is that several of the HTFs were made to commemorate specific events. Storyville was for one of the Convergences and Gothabilly was for a Bat's Day, I believe. Others have been for things like Comicon. Very small batches are produced because they are only meant to be purchased by people who physically go to the event. They are not available on-line to anyone, ever. Very small batches also mean the Lab can use rare ingredients that they may only have a limited supply of and may never get again. This is why resurecteds are rare, the ingredients for the recipe just don't exist (and in some cases, the recipes themselves were lost).
And some things, like Candy Butcher and VILF weren't meant to be limited, but an ingredient is no longer available, so they were discontinued before their time.
This post has been edited by Altaira: 05 March 2012 - 05:51 PM
#73
Posted 19 March 2012 - 05:22 AM
Anyway, I was just wondering what the LE cycle is- which ones are reoccurring throughout the year. I know of course about Lunacy, Lupercalia, Weenies and Yule, but what about other things like the Moths and Butterflies or the Bards? Are those annual as well? If someone could write up a little thing of the LE cycle I would really appreciate it. http://www.bpal.org/public/style_emoticons/default/00001616.gif
#74
Posted 19 March 2012 - 08:11 PM

Help


